Age-Related Differences in the Presentation, Management, and Clinical Outcomes of 100,000 Patients With Venous Thromboembolism in the RIETE Registry / Diferencias relacionadas con la edad en la presentación, el tratamiento y los resultados clínicos de 100.000 pacientes con tromboembolismo venoso en el registro RIETE

Introduction: Although older adults represent a significant proportion of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), the data on the impact of age-related differences in the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of VTE are scarce. Methods: We analyzed data from the RIETE registry database, an ongoing global observational registry of patients with objectively confirmed VTE, to compare patient characteristics, clinical presentation, treatments, and outcomes between elderly (≥70 years) vs. non-elderly (<70 years) patients. Results: From January 2001 to March 2021, 100,000 adult patients were enrolled in RIETE. Elderly patients (47.9%) were more frequently women (58.2% vs. 43.5%), more likely had unprovoked VTE (50.5% vs. 45.1%) and most often presented with severe renal failure (10.2% vs. 1.2%) and acute pulmonary embolism (PE) (vs. deep vein thrombosis) (54.3% vs. 44.5%) compared to non-elderly patients (p<0.001 for all comparisons). For the PE subgroup, elderly patients more frequently had non-low risk PE (78.9% vs. 50.7%; p<0.001), respiratory failure (33.9% vs. 21.8%; p<0.001) and myocardial injury (40.0% vs. 26.2%; p<0.001) compared to non-elderly patients. Thrombolysis (0.9% vs. 1.7%; p<0.001) and direct oral anticoagulants (8.8% vs. 11.8%; p<0.001) were less frequently administered to elderly patients. Elderly patients showed a significantly higher 30-day all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95%CI: 1.22–1.52) and major bleeding (OR, 2.08; 95%CI, 1.85–2.33), but a lower risk of 30-day VTE recurrences (OR, 0.62, 95%CI, 0.54–0.71). Conclusions: Compared with non-elderly patients, elderly patients had a different VTE clinical profile. Advanced therapies were less frequently used in older patients. Age was an independent predictor of mortality.(AU)

Statin use and mortality in patients with deep vein thrombosis. Data from the RIETE Registry.

BACKGROUND: The association between statin use and mortality in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has not been rigorously evaluated. METHODS: We used the data in the RIETE registry to examine the association between statin use and mortality at 3 months. We used mixed effects survival models accounting for clinical covariates and clustering of patients in enrolling centers. RESULTS: From January 2009 through April 2022, there were 46,440 patients with isolated DVT in RIETE (in the lower-limbs 42,291, in the upper limbs 4149). Of these, 21 % and 18 %, respectively, were using statins. Statin users were older than non-users (72 ± 12 vs. 62 ± 18 years), and more likely had diabetes, hypertension, prior myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke, or were receiving antiplatelets. The 3-month mortality rates were: 6.0 % vs. 5.8 %, respectively. On multilevel multivariable analysis, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for all-cause death in statin users vs. non-users was 0.77 (95%CI: 0.69-0.86). The 3-month risk of death in statin users was significantly lower than in non-users in patients with upper-limb DVT (aHR: 0.81; 95%CI: 0.72-0.91), distal lower-limb DVT (aHR: 0.48; 95%CI: 0.32-0.72), or proximal lower-limb DVT (aHR: 0.69; 95%CI: 0.50-0.95), and in those receiving simvastatin (aHR: 0.73; 95%CI: 0.60-0.90), atorvastatin (aHR: 0.70; 95%CI: 0.59-0.85), or rosuvastatin (aHR: 0.47; 95%CI: 0.27-0.80). Major bleeding, used as a falsification endpoint, did not show an association with use of statins at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Statin users with isolated DVT were at significantly lower risk for death at 3 months than non-users.

Changes in sleep-disordered breathing from the acute to the stable phase of pulmonary embolism: The ESAET study.

BACKGROUND: /Objective: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) may change from the acute to stable phase of some cardiovascular disorders, but little is known whether these dynamic changes also exist in pulmonary embolism (PE). This study aimed to analyze the changes in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from the acute to stable phase of PE as well as the factors associated. PATIENTS/METHODS: We conducted a prospective, longitudinal and multicenter study of consecutive adults requiring hospitalization for non-hypotensive acute PE, with a protocol including clinical, imaging (transthoracic echocardiography [TTE] and computed tomography), blood tests and a sleep study within 48 h of diagnosis of PE. After 3 months of follow-up, the sleep study was repeated. Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction was defined according to TTE criteria. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven patients (mean age [SD]: 63 [15] years; body mass index: 28.4 [4.7] kg/m2) were included. The initial AHI was 24.4 (21.8) events/h (AHI≥5: 82.8 %; AHI≥30: 33.3 %). Seventy-seven patients (69.4 %) had RV dysfunction. In the overall cohort, the AHI decreased by 8.7 events/h from the acute to stable phase (24.4/h vs. 15.7/h; p=0.013). Patients with RV dysfunction showed a greater decrease in AHI (mean decrease 12.3/h vs. 0.43/h). In the multivariable analysis a drop of an AHI≥5 events/hour was independently associated with the presence of initial RV dysfunction (hazard ratio 3.9; 95%CI 1.3 to 12.1). CONCLUSIONS: In hemodynamically stable patients with acute PE, there is a transient but clinically significant decrease in the AHI from the acute to stable phase, particularly when initially presenting with RV dysfunction.

Nocturnal hypoxemia and prognosis in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Nocturnal hypoxemia has been associated with cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of nocturnal hypoxemia among patients with hemodynamically stable acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: We performed an ad hoc secondary analysis of clinical data from a prospective cohort study. Nocturnal hypoxemia was measured by the percent sleep registry with oxygen saturation <90% [TSat90]). Outcomes assessed over the 30-days after the diagnosis of PE included PE-related death, other cardiovascular deaths, clinical deterioration requiring an escalation of treatment, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), acute myocardial infarction [AMI], or stroke. RESULTS: Of the 221 hemodynamically stable patients with acute PE from which the TSat90 could be calculated and did not receive supplemental oxygen, the primary outcome occurred in 11 (5.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5% to 8.7%) within 30-days after the diagnosis of PE. When categorized by quartiles, TSat90 was not significantly associated with the occurrence of the primary outcome in unadjusted Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.63; P = 0.88), or after adjustment for body mass index (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.65; P = 0.92). When examined as a completely continuous variable (between 0 and 100), TSat90 was not associated with a significant increase in the adjusted hazard of 30-day primary outcome rates (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.10; P = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, nocturnal hypoxemia did not identify stable patients with acute symptomatic PE at increased risk for adverse cardiovascular events.

Feasibility of a screening algorithm for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: The OSIRIS study.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a long-term sequel to pulmonary embolism (PE) whose incidence varies according to different published studies. We have carried out this study to determine its incidence within 2 years after index pulmonary embolism and to study limitations to an early diagnosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: OSIRIS is a multicentre, longitudinal cohort study. Patients were followed for 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after pulmonary embolism using a structured three-step algorithm. A physician-centered questionnaire at least one positive response in a screening proceeded to the second step, transthoracic echocardiography. The third step consisted of ventilation/perfusion lung scintigraphy and right heart catheterisation. A transthoracic echocardiography was performed in patients without positive response in the screening questionnaire after 2 years. CTEPH diagnosis required haemodynamic confirmation by right heart catheterisation and mismatched perfusion defects on lung scintigraphy. RESULTS: A total of 1191 patients were enrolled in 18 Spanish hospitals. Cumulative CTEPH incidence after 2-years PE was: 2.49 % (95 % CI: 1.68-3.56) and the incidence rate of CTEPH was 1.1 cases per 1000 person-months (95 % CI: 0.725; 1.60). The CTEPH algorithm presented a lack of adherence of 29 %; patient and physician preferences posed barriers to the triage algorithm The screening questionnaire, in patients who completed the follow-up, shows a specificity of 91.3 % (89.0-93.2 %) and negative predictive value of 99.4 % (98.4-99.8 %).. CONCLUSIONS: OSIRIS provides practiced clinical based data on the chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension incidence and identified barriers to the implementation of a 3-step triage algorithm for its detection. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03134898.

Role of Sleep Apnea and Long-Term CPAP Treatment in the Prognosis of Patients With Melanoma: A Prospective Multicenter Study of 443 Patients.

BACKGROUND: OSA has been associated with increased incidence and aggressiveness of melanoma. However, the long-term impact of OSA and CPAP treatment on the prognosis of melanoma remains unexplored. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are OSA and CPAP treatment associated independently with a poor prognosis for cutaneous melanoma? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Four hundred forty-three patients with a diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma (2012-2015) underwent a sleep study within 6 months of diagnosis. The main 5-year outcome of the study was a composite of melanoma recurrence, metastasis, or mortality. Patients were divided into four groups: baseline apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of fewer than 10 events/h (no OSA; control group), OSA treated with CPAP and good adherence, untreated or poor CPAP adherence in moderate (AHI, 10-29 events/h), and severe OSA (AHI, ≥ 30 events/h). Survival analysis was used to determine the independent role of OSA and CPAP treatment on melanoma composite outcome. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-one patients (88.2%) were available for analysis at 5-year follow-up (mean age, 65.1 ± 15.2 years; 49% male; Breslow index, 1.7 ± 2.5 mm). One hundred thirty-nine patients had AHI of fewer than 10 events/h (control group); 78 patients with OSA were adherent to CPAP; and 124 and 50 patients had moderate and severe OSA, respectively, without CPAP treatment. Median follow-up was 60 months (interquartile range, 51-74 months). During follow-up, 32 relapses, 53 metastases, and 52 deaths occurred (116 patients showed at least one of the main composite outcomes). After adjusting for age, sex, sentinel lymph nodes affected at diagnosis, BMI, diabetes, nighttime with an oxygen saturation below 90%, Breslow index, Epworth sleepiness scale scores, and melanoma treatment, moderate (hazard ratio [HR], 2.45; 95% CI, 1.09-5.49) and severe OSA (HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.36-6.42) were associated with poorer prognosis of melanoma compared with the control group. However, good adherence to CPAP avoided this excess risk (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.71-3.90). INTERPRETATION: Moderate to severe untreated OSA is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis of melanoma. Treatment with CPAP is associated with improved melanoma outcomes compared with untreated moderate to severe OSA.

Placebo response in objective and subjective measures of hypersomnia in randomized clinical trials on obstructive sleep apnea. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sleepiness is one of the outcomes most used in randomized clinical trials (RCT) on the effect of treatments for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Furthermore, it is known that there is a placebo effect, especially in subjective measures. Therefore, given that sleepiness is a subjective measure, the objective of this systematic review with meta-analysis and three-level meta-regression was to assess the response to different placebos (pills and sham-CPAP) used in RCTs in OSA, both on subjective (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]) and objective (Multiple Sleep Latency Test [MSLT], Maintenance Wake Test [MWT], the Osler test and the Psychomotor Vigilance Task [PVT]). We observed a statistically significant placebo effect in both subjective and objective measures of hypersomnia, and in both sham-CPAP and pills. This placebo effect was greater, even clinically significant, in subjective measures (ESS: -2.84 points) and in those RCTs that used pills as a placebo. In the meta-regression, only a higher baseline value of the ESS and Osler test was related to the placebo effect.

Bronchiectasis and COVID-19 infection: a two-way street.

ABSTRACT: Bronchiectasis (BE) has been linked to past viral infections such as influenza, measles, or adenovirus. Two years ago, a new pandemic viral infection severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) broke out and it still persists today, and a significant proportion of surviving patients have radiological and clinical sequelae, including BE. Our aim was to thoroughly review the information available in the literature on the bidirectional relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and the development of BE, as well as the impact of this infection on patients already suffering from BE. Available information indicates that only a small percentage of patients in the acute phase of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia develop BE, although the latter is recognized as one of the radiological sequelae of COVID-19 pneumonia, especially when it is caused by traction. The severity of the initial pneumonia is the main risk factor for the development of future BE, but during the COVID-19 pandemic, exacerbations in BE patients were reduced by approximately 50%. Finally, the impact of BE on the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia is not yet known.

Inhaled Corticosteroids in Adults with Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: From Bench to Bedside. A Narrative Review.

Due to their potent anti-inflammatory capacity (particularly in predominantly eosinophilic inflammation) and immunosuppressive properties, inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are widely used in asthmatic patients and also in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who suffer multiple exacerbations or have peripheral eosinophilia. However, there is little evidence for their use in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (hereafter, bronchiectasis). According to data extracted from large databases of bronchiectasis in adults, ICSs are used in more than 50% of patients without any scientific evidence to justify their efficacy and contrary to the recommendations of international guidelines on bronchiectasis that generally advise against their use. Indeed, bronchiectasis is a disease with predominantly neutrophilic inflammation and a high likelihood of chronic bacterial bronchial infection. Furthermore, it is known that due to their immunosuppressive properties, ICSs can induce an increase in bacterial infections. This manuscript aims to review the basic properties of ICSs, how they impact bronchiectasis in adults, the current position of international guidelines on this treatment, and the current indications and future challenges related to ICS use in bronchiectasis.

Practical tips in bronchiectasis for Primary Care.

Bronchiectasis is the third most common chronic inflammatory airway disease, after chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma with a prevalence clearly underestimated probably because of its clinical similitudes with other chronic airway diseases. Bronchiectasis can be caused by a dozen of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary diseases and a variable number and severity of exacerbations can appear throughout its natural history, usually with an infectious profile. The dilation of the airway and the inflammation/infection is their radiological and pathophysiological hallmarks. Primary Care should play an important play in many aspects of the bronchiectasis assessment. In this article, we will try to offer a series of important concepts and practical tips on some key aspects of the diagnosis and management of bronchiectasis in Primary Care: clinical suspicion, diagnostic methods, severity assessment, overlap with asthma and COPD and microbiological and therapeutic aspects.

Cellular Indices and Outcome in Patients with Acute Venous Thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Cellular indices provide integrative information about systemic inflammation status which is readily available from routine laboratory parameters. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of three cellular indices in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: The RIETE registry database was used to determine the association between the baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte-ratio (PLR) and systemic-immune-inflammation-index (SII) for 90-day adverse outcomes in patients with acute VTE. RESULTS: From January 2020 to April 2021, 4487 patients with acute VTE were recruited in the RIETE registry. Of these, 2683 presented with symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE); 283 with incidental PE; 1129 with lower-limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT); 175 with upper-limb DVT; 69 with splanchnic vein thrombosis; 142 with superficial vein thrombosis and 20 with retinal vein thrombosis. Mean values were: NLR 5.9 ± 7.1, PLR 190 ± 158 and SII 1459 ± 2028. During the first 90-days, 38 patients (0.8%) developed recurrent DVT, 45 (1.0%) had recurrent PE, 152 (3.4%) suffered major bleeding, and 484 (11%) died. On multivariable analysis, patients with NLR >4.41 were at an increased risk for major bleeding and patients with NLR >4.96 were at the risk of death, while those with SII >1134.5 were at increased risk for death. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the results of a large cohort to date which evaluate the prognostic value of three cellular indices simultaneously in patients with acute VTE. Results support that none of the three baseline cellular indices were sufficient for prediction of VTE recurrences in acute VTE patients. The patients with higher baseline NLR values were at an increased risk of major bleeding or death, those with high SII values were only at an increased risk for mortality.

Untreated obstructive sleep apnea and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.

There is a paucity of data examining the prognostic significance of untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). This prospective cohort study enrolled consecutive non-hypotensive patients with acute PE who underwent an overnight sleep study within 48 h after diagnosis. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on apnea-hypopnea index (AHI): OSA (AHI ≥15) and non-OSA (AHI <15) groups. The study used a composite of fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular events, including PE-related death, other cardiovascular deaths, clinical deterioration requiring an escalation of treatment, recurrent venous thromboembolism, acute myocardial infarction, or stroke within 30-days after the diagnosis of PE as the primary outcome. Between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, 283 eligible patients were prospectively enrolled in 2 academic hospitals, of whom 268 patients completed a sleep study within 7 days of PE diagnosis. OSA was found in 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41 to 54%) of patients. The primary outcome occurred in 13 (4.9%) patients within 30-days after the diagnosis of PE. The crude incidence of the composite was not significantly different in the OSA than the non-OSA group (30-day estimate, 6.3% versus 3.5%; P = 0.30). OSA did not significantly predict the incidence of the primary outcome after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-6.87). In this study, untreated OSA was not a significant multivariable predictor of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute PE.

Effect of Prognostic Guided Management of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism According to the European Society of Cardiology Risk Stratification Model.

Background: A recent trial showed that management driven by prognostic assessment was effective in reducing the length of stay (LOS) for acute stable pulmonary embolism (PE). The efficacy and safety of this strategy in each subgroup of risk stratification remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the randomized IPEP study to evaluate the effect of a management strategy guided by early use of a prognostic pathway in the low- and intermediate-high risk subgroups defined by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) model. These subgroups were retrospectively identified in the control arm. The primary outcome was LOS. The secondary outcomes were 30-day clinical outcomes. Results: Of 249 patients assigned to the intervention group, 60 (24%) were classified as low-, and 30 (12%) as intermediate-high risk. Among 249 patients assigned to the control group, 66 (27%) were low-, and 13 (5%) intermediate-high risk. In the low-risk group, the mean LOS was 2.1 (±0.9) days in the intervention group and 5.3 (±2.9) days in the control group (P < 0.001). In this group, no significant differences were observed in 30-day readmissions (0% vs. 3.0%, respectively), all-cause (0% vs. 0%) and PE-related mortality rates (0% vs. 0%), or severe adverse events (0% vs. 1.5%). In the intermediate-high risk group, the mean LOS was 5.3 (±1.8) days in the intervention group and 6.5 (±2.5) days in the control group (P = 0.08). In this group, no significant differences were observed in 30-day readmissions (3.3% vs. 3.0%, respectively), all-cause (6.7% vs. 7.7%) and PE-related mortality rates (6.7% vs. 7.7%), or severe adverse events (16.7% vs. 15.4%). Conclusion: The use of a prognostic assessment and management pathway was effective in reducing the LOS for acute PE without comprising safety across subgroups of risk stratification. Clinical Trial Registration: [ClinicalTrials.gov], Identifier [NCT02733198].

Biomarcadores biológicos en las enfermedades respiratorias / Biological Biomarkers in Respiratory Diseases

En los últimos años la llamada «medicina personalizada o de precisión» ha irrumpido con fuerza en el manejo de las enfermedades, entre ellas las respiratorias. La posibilidad de implantar esta forma de trabajar pasa indefectiblemente por el hallazgo y validación de biomarcadores biológicos que se relacionen bien con el diagnóstico, tratamiento o pronóstico de los pacientes respiratorios. En este sentido, la mayoría de enfermedades respiratorias o grupo de las mismas ya cuentan con biomarcadores biológicos de mayor o menor fiabilidad, y se están realizando un gran número de estudios en busca de nuevos de estos indicadores. El objetivo de la presente revisión es poner al día al lector y analizar la literatura científica existente sobre la existencia y validez diagnóstica, terapéutica o pronóstica de los biomarcadores biológicos más importantes en la actualidad en las principales enfermedades respiratorias, así como sobre los retos futuros en este sentido. (AU)

In recent years, personalized or precision medicine has made effective inroads into the management of diseases, including respiratory diseases. The route to implementing this approach must invariably start with the identification and validation of biological biomarkers that are closely related to the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of respiratory patients. In this respect, biological biomarkers of greater or lesser reliability have been identified for most respiratory diseases and disease classes, and a large number of studies are being conducted in the search for new indicators. The aim of this review is to update the reader and to analyze the existing scientific literature on the existence and diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic validity of the most important biological biomarkers in the main respiratory diseases, and to identify future challenges in this area. (AU)

[Translated article] Biological Biomarkers in Respiratory Diseases / Biomarcadores biológicos en las enfermedades respiratorias

In recent years, personalized or precision medicine has made effective inroads into the management of diseases, including respiratory diseases. The route to implementing this approach must invariably start with the identification and validation of biological biomarkers that are closely related to the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of respiratory patients. In this respect, biological biomarkers of greater or lesser reliability have been identified for most respiratory diseases and disease classes, and a large number of studies are being conducted in the search for new indicators. The aim of this review is to update the reader and to analyze the existing scientific literature on the existence and diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic validity of the most important biological biomarkers in the main respiratory diseases, and to identify future challenges in this area. (AU)

En los últimos años la llamada «medicina personalizada o de precisión» ha irrumpido con fuerza en el manejo de las enfermedades, entre ellas las respiratorias. La posibilidad de implantar esta forma de trabajar pasa indefectiblemente por el hallazgo y validación de biomarcadores biológicos que se relacionen bien con el diagnóstico, tratamiento o pronóstico de los pacientes respiratorios. En este sentido, la mayoría de enfermedades respiratorias o grupo de las mismas ya cuentan con biomarcadores biológicos de mayor o menor fiabilidad, y se están realizando un gran número de estudios en busca de nuevos de estos indicadores. El objetivo de la presente revisión es poner al día al lector y analizar la literatura científica existente sobre la existencia y validez diagnóstica, terapéutica o pronóstica de los biomarcadores biológicos más importantes en la actualidad en las principales enfermedades respiratorias, así como sobre los retos futuros en este sentido. (AU)

Biological Biomarkers in Respiratory Diseases. / Biomarcadores biológicos en las enfermedades respiratorias.

In recent years, personalized or precision medicine has made effective inroads into the management of diseases, including respiratory diseases. The route to implementing this approach must invariably start with the identification and validation of biological biomarkers that are closely related to the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of respiratory patients. In this respect, biological biomarkers of greater or lesser reliability have been identified for most respiratory diseases and disease classes, and a large number of studies are being conducted in the search for new indicators. The aim of this review is to update the reader and to analyze the existing scientific literature on the existence and diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic validity of the most important biological biomarkers in the main respiratory diseases, and to identify future challenges in this area.